Election Integrity Network

The Election Integrity Network is an influential election monitoring group that mobilizes “conspiracy-minded MAGA activists” to employ “Jim Crow-style voter suppression techniques” under the leadership of Cleta Mitchell, a former Trump lawyer and prominent 2020 election denier.

Key Takeaways

● Actively involved in efforts to purge voter rolls and empower local officials to contest election results
● Led by Cleta Mitchell, known for participating in Trump’s call with Georgia’s Secretary of State asking him to “find” votes
● Organizes and trains volunteers across the country to engage in “election integrity” activities

Top Leadership

● Cleta Mitchell, President
● Marshall Yates, Executive Director
● Wade Miller, Chair & Director

Tax Status

501(c)(4)

EIN

88-2166493

Year Formed

2022

Location

Washington, DC

Total Revenue In Most Recent Tax Year

$753,255

Total Expenses In Most Recent Tax Year

$746,957

Total Assets In Most Recent Tax Year

$24,298
About Election Integrity Network

The Election Integrity Network is an influential election monitoring group that mobilizes “conspiracy-minded MAGA activists” to employ “Jim Crow-style voter suppression techniques” under the leadership of Cleta Mitchell, a former Trump lawyer and prominent 2020 election denier. In 2022, EIN broke off as its own independent 501(c)(4) organization after previously being a project of the Conservative Partnership Institute. Voting rights groups have warned that EIN’s ostensible “election integrity” organizing efforts are “a recipe for more verbal and physical threats against election administration officials” and, as a result, partisans and vigilantes will mobilize to intimidate voters and thwart their participation.”

Cleta Mitchell, President

Cleta Mitchell is a prominent, conservative legal activist who was a key advisor to President Trump during his attempts to overturn the 2020 election. Described by her former colleagues as “fringe of the fringe,” Mitchell has played a major role in driving far-right ideas and tactics into the mainstream conservative movement. She has successfully popularized voter fraud conspiracy theories within right-wing circles. Since the 2020 election, she has devoted much of her energy to undermining election administration through the Election Integrity Network, a group launched by the Conservative Partnership Institute that later split off as a separate organization in 2022.

Mitchell is the longtime head of the Republican National Lawyers Association, which has focused on training its members in election law since the contested 2000 election. She previously worked as counsel to the National Republican Senatorial Committee and the National Republican Congressional Republican Committee. Mitchell was a board member of the NRA and the American Conservative Union. She has ties to the secretive Council for National Policy, FreedomWorks, and the Federalist Society. She currently serves on the U.S. Election Assistance Commission

Mitchell is known for her legal activism around election laws and unfounded claims of rampant voter fraud. She participated in Trump’s infamous phone call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger on January 2, 2021, where Trump demanded that Raffensperger “find” enough votes for him to win the state. Mitchell has said that Trump’s disproven allegations of voter fraud were never properly addressed by the courts. The House January 6th Committee subpoenaed Mitchell for her role in the insurrection, as did a Fulton County, Georgia special grand jury investigating potential criminal interference in the election. Mitchell has worked to defy the House Committee’s subpoena, represented by a law firm that receives payments from a Trump PAC.

Following Trump’s departure from the White House, Mitchell took on a leading role in the right-wing assault on voting rights. In addition to her role at the Election Integrity Network, Mitchell has advised conservative leaders on how to strike down legislation that removes barriers to voting and how to craft policies to make voting more difficult. 

Early Life And Entrance To Conservative Politics

Before she became a powerful activist in right-wing circles, Mitchell began her career as a Democratic member of the Oklahoma House of Representatives in the 1970s and 1980s. She changed her affiliation to independent following an unsuccessful campaign for lieutenant governor of Oklahoma in 1986. She changed her affiliation to Republican in the early 1990s after an FBI investigation against her husband resulted in numerous felony convictions against him, and her family had to pay $3 million in restitution. The investigation convinced Mitchell that “overreaching government regulation is one of the great scandals of our times” and played a role in her becoming an anti-government, populist activist. 

Challenges To Campaign Finance Regulations

Mitchell served as the co-counsel to the National Rifle Association when the organization and Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) mounted a legal challenge against the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act in 2002. The act aimed to prohibit unlimited funding to political parties, known as “soft money,” and limit donations made to a candidate’s campaign or “hard money.” The Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. FEC in 2010 struck down much of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act. 

Tea Party Movement

Mitchell was a key player in the rise of the Tea Party movement in the early 2010s, which political analysts have characterized as a backlash to the election of President Barack Obama. The Wall Street Journal said Mitchell was the “attack attorney of choice for tea-party stars,” including congressional candidates Sharron Angle (R-NV), Christine O’Donnell (R-DE), Joe Miller (R-AK), and Sens. Jim DeMint (R-SC), Pat Toomey (R-PA), Marco Rubio (R-FL), and Kelly Ayotte (R-NH). Mitchell has also represented Republican members of Congress such as Sen. Elizabeth Dole (R-NC), Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK.), Sen. David Vitter (R-LA), Sen. Gordon Smith (R-OR), and Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK).

Mitchell weaponized campaign finance complaints to accuse Democrats of illegal campaign tactics and voter fraud. She also used her legal playbook to pressure third-party candidates to drop out of races that were important to the GOP. Conservative commentator George Will described her as “[arguably] the most important Washington conservative not in public office“ during this time.

Anti-LGBTQ Activism

Following a vote by Washington D.C. City Council to legalize same-sex marriage, Mitchell led a campaign by Stand4Marriage to put the decision up to a ballot referendum to overturn it. 

Mitchell was the chief lobbyist for the anti-LGBTQ organization, the National Organization For Marriage, as the group attempted to outlaw same-sex marriage in Minnesota via ballot initiative. NOM was run by Brian Brown, the co-founder of the Public Interest Legal Foundation (formerly ActRight Legal Foundation), a conservative legal organization that works to undermine voting rights. Additionally, former PILF treasurer and close Leonard Leo ally Neil Corkery was an executive officer of NOM. The LGBTQ rights group Human Rights Campaign also accused Mitchell’s law firm of promoting hate against the anti-LGBTQ community. 

The Atlantic called Mitchell “the Conservative Movement’s Anti-Gay Eminence Grise” after she reportedly led an effort to ban the pro-LGBTQ conservative group GOProud from CPAC, the conservative movement’s annual gala. Mitchell allegedly used her connections in the Tea Party movement to force the ban. Mitchell said of GOProud, “I have no idea what they do except promote the homosexual agenda.” The leader of GOProud called Mitchell a “nasty bigot” for her actions.

Exaggerated Claims Of “Election Integrity”

In 2010, Mitchell claimed that then-Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid was providing “clearly illegal” food to voters to steal his re-election that he couldn’t win “outright.” Reid won his re-election by more than 40,000 votes.

Mitchell served as the counsel of True the Vote, an organization that has promoted conspiracy theories about election fraud, and she helped secure its nonprofit, tax-exempt status. To back up TTV’s tax-exempt application, Mitchell tried to argue that “fraudulent voting occurs in the United States” by citing a 2010 case that involved a small rural school district in which the judge ruled there was “no intent to cast a false or fraudulent ballot.” 

In 2012, Mitchell joined the board of directors of the Bradley Foundation, a right-wing funding organization. While the Bradley Foundation had dabbled in promoting unfounded allegations of voter fraud, Mitchell’s presence had a clear impact. Since Mitchell joined the Bradley Foundation, the group has spent roughly $18 million on efforts to stoke conspiracies about election fraud and efforts to enact voter suppression. The foundation has since become a leader in mainstreaming election fraud ideology among conservative circles. The Bradley Foundation has funded voter suppression groups she is directly involved with, such as PILF and True the Vote, as well as groups affiliated with Hans von Spakovksy and J. Christian Adams.

Defense Of Fraud

Mitchell represented Steve Bannon’s nonprofit, Citizens of the American Republic, as it faced allegations of defrauded investors. Federal prosecutors reportedly wanted to seize assets from CAR, an organization that sought to promote “economic nationalism” and solicited funding to build a U.S.-Mexico border wall that never materialized. Bannon was charged with fraud in the border wall scheme and ultimately indicted in 2022.

In 2018, Mitchell set up a legal defense fund for Scott Pruitt, then-head of the EPA, to fight accusations of nepotism after he reportedly worked with Republican donors to help his wife land a job with the Judicial Crisis Network. Pruitt’s wife was hired as an independent contractor by JCN, the right-wing group run by Leonard Leo, an influential judicial activist and Pruitt’s “longtime close friend.” A JCN spokesperson said, “the position came about after the group received her résumé from Leonard Leo.” 

Mitchell also solicited donations for the defense fund from a conservative billionaire. In an impassioned op-ed defending Pruitt, Mitchell called the scandal the result of a “vicious Left.”

When then-House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX) was indicted for campaign finance violations, Mitchell repeatedly defended him. Mitchell claimed DeLay was targeted because he was “effective” and said the indictment was “politically motivated.” DeLay was forced to resign over the indictment and convicted of money laundering five years later.

Trump-Russia Allegations

In 2018, Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee wanted to interview Cleta Mitchell about her alleged role in Russia’s potential interference in the 2016 election. At the time, the FBI was investigating Russians who supplied part of the $30 million the NRA spent to elect Trump. Foreign support of American politician candidates is illegal. Mitchell, who had served as counsel and a board member at the NRA, called the allegations a “complete fabrication.” Mitchell also publicly attacked the FBI, asking why they were not investigating Hillary Clinton instead of Trump. In 2019, a Senate report revealed that top NRA officials were aware Russians were using their ties with the organization to influence the election.

Disregard For COVID-19 Public Health Measures

Mitchell signed a letter in April 2020 asking the Justice Department to overturn COVID-19 safety restrictions on religious institutions. At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, Mitchell attended a White House party celebrating the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court without a mask. The incident became a superspreader event. Soon after, despite being photographed close to multiple people who had tested positive for the virus, Mitchell attended an event at FreedomWorks. FreedomWorks helped organize protests against stay-at-home orders amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. 

Leadup To The 2020 Election

In a leaked speech at the secretive Council for National Policy in 2019, Mitchell “warned that Democrats were successfully registering what she sarcastically referred to as ‘the disenfranchised.” She continued, “They know that if they target certain communities and they can get them registered and get them to the polls, then those groups […] will vote ninety percent, ninety-five percent for Democrats.”

In August 2020, Trump met with Mitchell in the Oval Office and called her a “great attorney.” Mitchell received the blessing from Trump’s legal team to build the framework for challenging the election results if Trump lost.

Mitchell helped Republican operatives and conservative activists adopt radical strategies in preparation to overturn a potential loss for Trump in 2020. She convened a working group with the powerful corporate “bill mill” the American Legislative Exchange Council. ALEC worked to develop the legal groundwork to allow state legislators to utilize the Electoral College to overturn the results of the popular vote in their state over fraud concerns. ALEC has received support from the Bradley Foundation, where Mitchell serves on the board. 

In a speech at the Council for National Policy months before the 2020 election, the leader of ALEC said that the group was working closely with Mitchell and fellow PILF leader Hans von Spakovksy to explore means to challenge the validity of the election preemptively should Trump lose. 

Arizona state Rep. Shawana Bolick was closely involved in Mitchell’s working group and has since claimed she would not have certified Biden’s 2020 electoral victory. After the election, Bolick introduced legislation allowing the Arizona legislature to overturn the popular vote in its state, “a radical reading of Article II of the Constitution,” according to The New Yorker. This legal interpretation is similar to the memo PILF leader John Eastman presented to Trump in a last-ditch attempt to overturn the 2020 election. Constitutional legal scholars such as Laurence Tribe, Neil Buchanan, and Michael Dorf have said such interpretations “would make a mockery of American democracy” and are “laughably stupid.”

Role In Efforts To Overturn The 2020 Election

Mitchell said she was motivated by Democrats’ “very well-planned-out assault” on the election to mount challenges. The “assault” Mitchell was referring to was the expansion of COVID-19 safe voting options, which studies found significantly increased voter turnout in a bipartisan manner that did not favor Democrats or Republicans. 

Trump’s chief of staff, Mark Meadows, directed Mitchell to go to work in Georgia the day after the election. Three days later, the day most national news outlets called the race for Joe Biden, Mitchell claimed she had substantial proof of illegal ballots filed by dead people that swayed the election–a claim which has since been disproven. By December, her team filed a legal challenge. Meadows’ PAC paid Mitchell’s law firm in December 2020. 

Michell also participated in the infamous phone call Trump made to fellow Republican and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, pressuring him to “find” just enough votes to ensure Trump won the state and threatening potential criminal consequences if Raffensperger didn’t comply. Mitchell was on the call to support Trump and make his case to Raffensperger.  The Washington Post characterized the call as “an extraordinary one-hour phone call Saturday that legal scholars described as a flagrant abuse of power and a potential criminal act.” After news of the call became public, Foley & Lardner, the law firm where Mitchell had been a partner for years, distanced itself from her. Mitchell later resigned but claimed it had nothing to do with her role in the phone call.

The call was part of a larger campaign to influence Georgia to flip its election results to deliver Trump the 2020 election. Mitchell continues to defend the Georgia campaign, claiming that she doesn’t “think we can say with certainty who won.” Georgia has conducted three independent counts, including a recount by hand, all proving Joe Biden won the state.

Mitchell brought fellow PILF leader John Eastman into the fold of Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Eastman provided dubious legal theories to Pence and Trump, including presenting a six-point plan to keep Trump in office just before the events of Jan. Eastman then spoke at the rally that preceded the Capitol riot. 

Long after the dust settled on the election, Mitchell continued to pressure Georgia to find evidence of widespread election fraud she alleges occurred in 2020, fueling conspiracy theories about the election. As The New Yorker notes, Mitchell and her allies “keep demanding that election officials prove a negative—that corruption didn’t happen—their requests to keep interrogating the results can be repeated almost indefinitely.” The Jan. 6 Committee has subpoenaed Mitchell over her alleged role in the insurrection. 

As of 2021, Mitchell represented right-wing cable news outlet Newsmax as a client. The organization is currently facing multi-billion dollar lawsuits for spreading conspiracies that defamed voting machine companies. 

Voter Suppression And Election Audits

Since Trump left office, Mitchell has advised conservative leaders on how to craft policy to restrict voting access and oppose efforts to expand it. In 2021, Mitchell was put in charge of a $10 million dollar FreedomWorks initiative to push for voting restrictions and train conservatives for local elections. 

Mitchell also set up an escrow account to fund the Maricopa County, Arizona audit of the 2020 election. The election audit, administered at the instruction of the state’s conservative state legislature, was financed by right-wing conspiratorial groups with connections to QAnon. The audit itself was conducted by the firm Cyber Ninjas, which had “no election or auditing experience” and was “led by a conspiracy theorist who believes the election was rigged.” Cyber Ninja’s audit ultimately found no evidence of mass fraud.

Marshall Yates, Executive Director

Prior to becoming executive director of the Election Integrity Network, Yates worked as chief of staff for Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL). He also previously managed several local campaigns in Alabama.

Wade Miller, Chair & Director

Wade Miller is a senior advisor at the Center for Renewing America, an organization closely associated with Election Integrity Network. Miller previously served in the U.S. Marine Corps as an infantryman, and served as political director for Senator Ted Cruz. He also previously served as chief of staff to Rep. Chip Roy.

Origin at the Conservative Partnership Institute

Since its founding in 2017, the Conservative Partnership Institute has served as an incubator for numerous right-wing organizations, all sharing the same address. The group has been called an “extension of the Trump infrastructure” and the most powerful messaging force in the MAGA universe.” CPI and its nearly one dozen affiliate groups employ a “who’s who” of Jan. 6, earning it the title of the insurrectionists’ clubhouse.”

Along with the Election Integrity Network, Conservative Partnership has played a role in launching a number of other right-wing advocacy organizations, including America First Legal Foundation, Center for Renewing America, and American Accountability Foundation.

Independent Organization

In 2022, the Election Integrity Network became an independent 501(c)(4) nonprofit separate from the Conservative Partnership Institute and released its first annual IRS form 990 that year outlining its finances. In its first year in operation, the Conservative Partnership Institute still made up the majority of Election Integrity Network’s funding, giving them $525,000.

The Election Integrity Network helps organize “election task forces” at the state and local levels, purportedly to protect the electoral process and ensure trained workers are at the polls. In reality, the group’s ostensible “election integrity” efforts involve intimidating election officials and searching for ways to invalidate voters’ ballots, effectively working to suppress the vote and cast doubt on the legitimacy of elections. The organization also endorses giving state legislatures more power in administering elections, which scholars say could radically reshape the nation’s election processes and flies in the face of the independent state legislature theory

Descriptions of the organization’s poll monitoring tactics frequently invoke violent rhetoric. 

EIN has used militaristic language to describe breakout sessions at its events, including one session called “Recruiting, Training, and Deploying Poll Workers and Poll Watchers.” When Cleta Mitchell was a guest on former Trump advisor and far-right activist Steve Bannon’s “War Room” podcast, Bannon used violent imagery to promote EIN’s activities, such as “[Cleta Mitchell] recruits [an] army of poll workers.” 

EIN’s efforts represent the growing trend of conspiracy theories and targeted right-wing attacks on electoral systems under the guise of “election security” concerns following the 2020 election. The Department of Justice says these types of efforts have led to threats against election officials and undermined election administration. 

  • In November 2020, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), an agency of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), released a joint statement from various state and local election officials stating that “the November 3rd election was the most secure in American history.”

  • The nonpartisan Brennan Center for Justice reported that false claims of fraud drove the efforts to interfere with the independent, nonpartisan counting of votes and certification of results. 

“Election Integrity” Summits 

The Conservative Partnership Institute has supported the Election Integrity Network’s training and organizing events; in particular, CPI has sponsored EIN’s series of summits in swing states such as Georgia, Arizona, Florida, Pennsylvania, Virginia, North Carolina, Wisconsin, and Michigan to help launch in-state “permanent election integrity coalitions” full of election deniers. EIN offers its continued support for these groups through regular calls, meetings, and organizing. 

At EIN summits, Cleta Mitchell leads training sessions for right-wing activists, conspiracy theorists, and 2020 election deniers to “stake out election offices, file information requests, monitor voting, work at polling places and keep detailed records of their work.” 

Mitchell points to her followers’ role in Virginia’s 2021 elections as a successful case study of their efforts. There, her trained volunteers filed complaints, overwhelmed county workers with information requests, and pushed false allegations of voter fraud in Fairfax County, an area that traditionally votes Democratic. 

In addition to recruiting and training election “task force” members, EIN uses its summits to spread disinformation about the 2020 election being stolen from Donald Trump. 

  • Events frequently feature panels promoting false claims of fraud and conspiracies about mail-in and absentee voting. Key Trumpworld figures like Mark Meadows have appeared at EIN’s summits to give keynote speeches with inflammatory titles such as, “What Happened in 2020 and What We Must Do to Protect Future Elections in Arizona.”

  • EIN has promoted a documentary by the Capital Research Center alleging that Mark Zuckerberg “manipulated” the 2020 election in favor of Democrats. 

EIN’s summits are often held in coordination with Republican National Committee leaders and sponsored by prominent conservative think tanks, legal and advocacy organizations, and funding groups, including FreedomWorks, the Heritage Foundation, the Public Interest Legal Foundation, and Tea Party Patriots. 

  • EIN has been closely collaborating with the Republican National Committee in preparation for the 2022 midterm elections. In August 2022, Politico obtained leaked audio recordings from EIN summits in Florida and Pennsylvania, during which RNC National Election Integrity Director Josh Findlay said Cleta Mitchell is “the best election and election law expert out there.”

  • The tapes feature Findlay speaking at several of Mitchell’s summits, indicating that “the RNC is relying heavily on people who have spread false or unproven claims of irregularities and conspiracies.” Politico reported that Findlay characterizes the committee’s role as supporting EIN by providing staff and “muscle” to “the quarterback of the effort,” Cleta Mitchell.

  • At one EIN summit in Florida in early 2022, Findlay said that the RNC is just “part of the team.”

“Citizen’s Guide To Building An Election Integrity Infrastructure” Manual

EIN’s network of election antagonists operates by recruiting poll watchers and other volunteers who are provided with a manual that goes into extreme detail on how to research election officials. The task force uses this data to classify election administrators as either “friend or foe.” The guide says that “Election Integrity is not (or should not be) a partisan issue,” yet it also explains how volunteers can work with “the local GOP” and encourages members to ask themselves, “Are the GOP members effective or silent partners?” 

Copies of EIN’s 19-page “Citizen’s Guide To Building An Election Integrity Infrastructure” are distributed to election task force volunteers, laying out the steps for creating a permanent workforce of election challengers. The guide details how to create state and local task forces that focus on their respective election boards, offices, and operations.

Among many other unusual actions, the guide instructs task force members to:

  • Seek legal counsel to strategize ways of “addressing the issues in the voter rolls in the state” to “protect against legal attacks by ideological activist groups.”

  • “Follow registration drives taking place in the area” and “monitor” new voter registrations for any “patterns.”

  • Purchase voter registration databases to identify ways to “clean voter rolls”

  • Compile “evidence” of illegal voter registrations by taking “photos of commercial buildings” and obtaining “affidavits from current residents that [sic] registered voter no longer resides at address.”

  • Observe voters casting their ballots at drop boxes, libraries, early voting locations, in-person voting locations, and facilities where absentee and mailed ballots are processed to identify “problems.”

  • “Befriend the Elections Director and local board members.”

Activities Leading Up To The 2024 Election And EagleAI

Since the 2020 election, Mitchell and the Election Integrity Network have expanded their influence over the “election integrity” space that purports to have concerns about voter fraud. According to the New Yorker, “A national coalition of G.O.P. activists and state and federal Party officials, called Only Citizens Vote, recently began to organize rallies and to give training sessions for poll monitors,” and they claim Mitchell is “at the center of the operation.”

Activists tied to Cleta Mitchell and the Election Integrity Network have been using a program called EagleAI leading up to the 2024 election, which is meant to help identify suspicious voter registrations in the voter rolls for volunteers to report to local officials. Specifically, Mitchell and EIN helped organize trainings on how to use the program, and volunteers began using it in 2023. The program is seen as an alternative to the Electronic Registration Information Center, which is “a bipartisan, interstate partnership that helps states share data to keep their voter rolls up-to-date” but has been the target of conspiracy theorists since the 2020 election. The use of EagleAI by partisan activists “risks overwhelming election workers with reports of problem registrations generated by amateurs using unreliable data,” according to experts and voting rights advocates. The Brennan Center claimed the effort “could undermine voting rights and elections” and “may be used to smear impartial election administration, disenfranchise voters, and set the stage for overturning unfavorable election results.”

In a possible prelude to EIN’s role in contesting 2024 election results, a Republican on the Fulton County election board who is an EIN regional coordinator, Julie Adams, refused to certify primary election results in Georgia in May 2024. Despite no valid claims of fraud in this election, Adams claimed that her reason for refusing to certify results was out of a desire “to fix the problems in our elections by ensuring compliance with the law, transparency in election conduct and accuracy in results.” As a regional coordinator for EIN, Adams is also involved in efforts to promote the EagleAI software. Later in 2024, the Republican-controlled state election board in Georgia passed a new rule giving county boards “the power to investigate irregularities and exclude entire precincts from the vote totals they certify,” which critics argue “can be used as a tool to disenfranchise select buckets of voters.” The new rule was initially proposed by a former Fulton County elections board member named Vernetta Adams, who said EIN’s Julie Adams “‘brought that particular concern’ to her and was ‘instrumental’ in bringing that rule and several others to the board.

Conservative Partnership Institute

The Conservative Partnership Institute has served as an incubator for numerous right-wing organizations, all sharing the same address. The group has been called an “extension of the Trump infrastructure” and the most powerful messaging force in the MAGA universe.” CPI and its nearly one dozen affiliate groups employ a “who’s who” of Jan. 6, earning it the title of the insurrectionists’ clubhouse.”

Along with the Election Integrity Network, Conservative Partnership has played a role in launching a number of other right-wing advocacy organizations, including America First Legal Foundation, Center for Renewing America, and American Accountability Foundation.

Public Interest Legal Foundation

Election Integrity Network President Cleta Mitchell also serves as chair and director of the Public Interest Legal Foundation, a nonprofit that aims to purge voter roles by suing states and local governments, often based on false, miscalculated, or inaccurate claims of voter and election fraud.

Center for Renewing America

The Election Integrity Network, which was established as a project of the Conservative Partnership Institute, shares an address with both CPI and the Center for Renewing America. Center for Renewing America’s affiliated 501(c)(4) organization, Citizens for Renewing America, is one of the primary funders of EIN and gave them $228,000 in 2022.

Prior to splitting off as a separate entity, EIN was a project housed within the Conservative Partnership Institute. In 2022, the same year EIN split off to become a separate entity, the Conservative Partnership Institute gave EIN $525,000. Additionally, Citizens for Renewing America gave EIN $228,200 in 2022. These two grants made up essentially all of EIN’s funding in 2022, which amounted to $753,255.

Stay Up To Date

Be the first to know when there is new information and updates.

Name:
Email: